Aerospace & DefenceCertification evidence, traced end to end.
Agents4DevOps applies formal requirement levels, derived-requirement handling, DAL and independence context, architecture and interface control, configuration management, verification coverage, SOI and certification gates, safety and security evidence, mission analysis and logistics support to governed agent workflows in Azure DevOps. Agents prepare and check. Your authorities approve.
No card required. Your data stays in your Azure DevOps tenant.
- ARP4754A
- ARP4761
- DO-178C
- DO-254
- DO-330
- DO-326A
Controlled levels and traceable evidence, or nothing.
Aerospace and defence programs run on controlled requirement levels, derived requirements, development-assurance objectives, independence, configuration baselines, interface agreements, structural coverage, verification evidence, certification-stage findings, mission context and lifecycle support. Generic assistant output does not hold up against that. Every artifact has a level, an owner and a baseline, and a change at one level can reopen objectives three levels down. For defence programs the Agent Library adds 13 Defence persona agents grounded in capability backlog management under JCIDS, DoDAF 2.02 architecture viewpoints, and NIST SP 800-171, CMMC 2.0 and DFARS cybersecurity compliance.
- 01
Derived requirements lose their flag.
A derived HLR is edited, and nobody records that it needs to go back to the system safety assessment.
- 02
Interfaces drift between teams.
Two sides of an ICD are updated at different times, and the bilateral agreement is only checked at the next review.
- 03
Coverage obligations reopen silently.
A low-level change invalidates structural coverage and independence evidence that was already counted as closed.
- 04
SOI packs are built by hand.
Before each certification stage, engineers spend days pulling objectives, data items, findings and baselines into one package.
Assurance context in every run.
The Aerospace & Defence pack sets the classification, traceability, standards mapping and gates the agents follow. Triggers and approvers stay with your program.
- 01 Classification
Severity, DAL and level
Failure-condition severity and development assurance level, system, software or hardware requirement level, derived status, control category, independence, mission criticality, and security and airworthiness context.
- 02 Traceability model
From mission need to certification data
Operational or mission need to system requirement, HLR, LLR and derived requirement, architecture and interface, implementation, verification objective and result, configuration baseline, and certification data package.
- 03 Standards & frameworks
Mapped to your assurance standards
ARP4754A, ARP4761, DO-178C, DO-254, DO-330, DO-326A and airworthiness security context, MIL-STD-882E, and S1000D where applicable. Defence personas add JCIDS, DoDAF 2.02, NIST SP 800-171, CMMC 2.0 and DFARS.
- 04 Lifecycle gates & evidence
The stages your authority reviews
System and software reviews, SOI and certification stages, requirements, design, code and test baselines, independence checks, structural coverage, configuration index, findings closure, and certification package readiness.
The Aerospace & Defence chain, kept intact.
A high-level requirement changes. The agent flags the affected LLRs, raises re-verification, and confirms traceability before the baseline moves.
- Mission need
- System req
- HLR / LLR
- Interface
- Implementation
- Verification
- Config baseline
- Cert data package
Where the agents do the work.
Eight workflows the pack is configured for. Each runs on a trigger your program set and leaves its output on the requirement, test or baseline it concerns.
Formal and derived requirements
Author, classify, link, baseline and map requirements, and analyze change impact across system and software levels.
Requirements Engineer Agent
DAL-aware architecture and interfaces
Maintain allocation, architecture views, ICDs, bilateral agreement, drift checks, safety and security impact, and reviews.
Business Analyst Agent
Verification and coverage
Design and manage formal tests, configurations, objective coverage, anomalies, regression and evidence.
QA Engineer Agent
Certification-stage readiness
Check objectives, data items, independence, findings, approvals, baselines and review packs before each gate.
Compliance Officer Agent
Configuration and change control
Maintain controlled baselines, problem reports, change categories, SCI and SECI-style status, and as-built consistency.
Release Manager AgentSafety and security
Maintain hazards, controls, traceability, vulnerability findings, verification and evidence.
Compliance Officer Agent
Mission and trade studies
Trace operational intent, analyze mission threads and scenarios, and structure trade criteria, sensitivity and decisions.
Product Owner Agent
ILS and technical publications
Maintain supportability, maintenance, spares, runbooks and source-linked technical documentation.
DevOps Engineer Agent
Twenty roles, configured for programs.
The supplied catalog includes these role configurations for Aerospace & Defence, plus a Defence section of 13 persona agents in the Agent Library.
Requirements Engineer Agent
Flags derived requirements, keeps HLR and LLR links current, and runs impact analysis across levels.
TestQA Engineer Agent
Maintains formal tests and objective coverage, and reopens evidence when a change touches verified code.
GovernCompliance Officer Agent
Checks objectives, independence and findings before each SOI and assembles the review pack.
ReleaseRelease Manager Agent
Keeps controlled baselines and problem reports consistent, and holds a baseline until approvals land.
Aerospace & Defence roles in the catalog
- Acceptance Coordinator
- Business Analyst
- Compliance Officer
- Configuration Manager
- Engineering Manager
- ILS / Logistics Engineer
- Interface Manager
- Mission Analysis Engineer
- Product Owner
- Project Manager
- QA Engineer
- Requirements Engineer
- Risk Manager
- Security Engineer
- Software Architect
- Systems Architect
- Team Assistant
- Technical Writer
- Test Engineer
- Trade Studies Engineer
A high-level requirement changes.
A software lead edits HLR-207 on a flight-control program. The agent's condition matches and the run starts. It checks whether the requirement is derived, then identifies the affected low-level requirements, architecture, interfaces, code, tests, independence and structural-coverage obligations, the safety assessment, baselines, certification data and open SOI findings. It finds that the requirement is derived and has not been fed back to the safety assessment, and that two LLR tests were run against the old revision. It creates the review and re-verification actions, opens a task for the named authority, and verifies that traceability is restored before the run closes.
run started · HLR-207 updated
DAL B · derived: yes · SOI 3 open
tracing: 4 LLRs · 1 ICD · 11 tests
finding: not fed to safety assessment
checkpoint · re-verification approval
verified · traceability restored
- ✓ Derived status recorded
- ! Fed back to safety assessment
- ✓ LLRs and ICD linked
- ! Tests on current revision
- ✓ Independence preserved
Your authorities keep every decision.
Agents classify, trace, check and assemble. Certification, airworthiness, DER, safety, systems, software and hardware, verification, configuration, security, mission and program authorities keep all accountable decisions and approvals. Required Approval pauses a run and opens a task for the named person, who can answer, attach files, and approve, edit or reject before anything is written.
[ Trusted by Microsoft and industry leaders ]
Aerospace & Defence questions.
It can prepare a classification from configured failure-condition inputs. Authorized safety and certification personnel review and approve the DAL.
It prepares and assembles source-linked drafts and evidence. The applicant and the certification authorities decide compliance and acceptability.
We do not claim classified deployment. That would need a verified architecture, accreditation, network, model, data-handling and operational approval path first. Talk to us about your environment before planning one.
The Agent Library has a Defence section of 13 role-based persona agents, grounded in capability backlog management under JCIDS, DoDAF 2.02 architecture viewpoints, and NIST SP 800-171, CMMC 2.0 and DFARS cybersecurity compliance. Add one with Use, and Compatibility Alignment maps it to your process template.
Yes. Attach your plans, standards and templates as knowledge, or turn on Bring Your Own Data so the agent retrieves from your documents, queries and wiki pages during the run. Every agent definition is versioned with rollback.
Yes. Each run keeps its trigger, the artifacts it read, the tools it used, proposed and completed actions, approval state, output, errors and verification result in the Job Explorer.
Credits are $0.01 each, pooled across your organization, with no per-user fees. A rule-shaped check, such as required links on every derived requirement, can run as an Execution Agent at a flat 4 credits. Agents pause cleanly at zero.
Bring a real requirement change to the demo.
Start a free trial with 1,000 credits, no card required. Or book a 30-minute demo with a requirement, interface, test or SOI finding from your own program, and watch the classification, trace, checkpoint and run record live.
